

Why does this person have enough money in a saving account that buying gold with it instead would make much of a difference in their personal wealth?
They’re losing far more to inflation than they are risking being stolen by some ai chatbot.


Why does this person have enough money in a saving account that buying gold with it instead would make much of a difference in their personal wealth?
They’re losing far more to inflation than they are risking being stolen by some ai chatbot.


Yeah but then you won’t get to experience the bland ass generic as fuck attempt to milk the fable franchise whose dev team apparently never bothered to even look at a picture of the originals


Or just let the parents turn it on or off instead of needing it to securely hold PII… Which we know never ends well. Doubtful they’ll be using the same device for their entire childhood anyway.


If we accept the premise
Let’s not. They’re doing this backwards. If this were actually for the children, identification happens by the content, with the filters set locally.
Not BROADCASTING TO THE ENTIRE INTERNET that a child is browsing.


LLMs do a really good job interpreting natural language inputs and deciphering the meaning behind it. The issue is they’re being presented as a fully fleshed out analytical machine that can replace entire job roles instead of the interpretation layer towards other processing they should be used as. The grifters are selling something as someone it very much is not


No he doesn’t. This is a sales pitch for a trash product he’s trying to unload after investing too heavily in it.
Stop promoting their bullshit marketing.
There’d be no use in mentioning it if it was a tiny amount. One doesn’t bemoan the state of the economy and eye transitioning their funds into gold if they’re talking about a single oz…
Just think that through for half a second before this needless rush to defend the author from remotely kind of critical analysis of their public statements.