I feel you, man. 🍻
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Retro@lemmy.worldtohomelab@lemmy.ml•Using cheap SSDs in RAID to increase speed/reliability?English2·2 years agoGotcha. If the m.2 is cheaper (and consider additional HBAs or Adapters or chassis you’d need), then I’d go m.2 still. Just figured SATA might be a little more straightforward and is typically cheaper. Seems reasonable enough.
Retro@lemmy.worldtohomelab@lemmy.ml•Using cheap SSDs in RAID to increase speed/reliability?English3·2 years agoNever tried a build withe M.2 drives, but unless you have a workload that actually needs that kind of speed, SATA SSDs might be better bang for the buck (especially if those m.2 drives aren’t nvme). If you’re just storing media or something, hard drives are probably still the way to go.
The $160 is a lifetime pass… I pay $20/mo for Netflix. That’s $240/year. So, if you think it’s worth it for even one year, compared to something like Netflix, then it’s a pretty solid value proposition.
I bought the lifetime pass in 2014 when it was $75. Been more than happy with that decision.
Retro@lemmy.worldto Selfhosted@lemmy.world•What can the 'average Joe' start hosting, that will change their life?English2·2 years agoAny reason to use PiHole over something like Adguard DNS?
Retro@lemmy.worldtohomelab@lemmy.ml•Mixing non-ECC RAM speeds in NAS with software RAID1·2 years agoShould be fine. All the memory will just need to run at the speed of the slower kit. Make sure you put the sticks in the correct channels for dual channel support. But yeah, maybe only do so when you actually need the memory.
Yeah, the ISP cartels sucks. I’ve been stuck paying $170/mo for uncapped 1000/35mbps connection.
Thankfully, before the end of the year, a local ISP is moving into my area. They offer uncapped symmetrical gigabit, for $75/mo… I’ll be saving $95/mo for BETTER service.
The longstanding ISP cartels should seriously be punished for the abuse of their market positions and failure to appropriately use government funding they’ve been given.