Tar_Alcaran

They’re 30 bucks…

A lot of writers seem to have forgotten that scifi uses aliens and new worlds to talk about humans. They just think that scifi uses aliens and new worlds.

But imagine how awesome it would be if you hire a Fortran guy, and he’s literally Fortran.

Depends on the country and the context. For private people in the Netherlands, it’s free. On my business account I pay something like 12 cents, plus 2 bucks per batch (which is why most companies only do payments every so often)…

Price Crypto at the one-year simple moving average, and the volatility stops.

What? No it doesn’t, you’re just shifting the volatility from your pricing to your consumption.

getting paid for freelance work that is available in Europe

Banktransfers are free…

Do yourself a favor and quickly google “who uses the F-22”

Israel mostly uses f-22s

Lolno

Quite a lot by Israel right now.

How many times has a defense minister said they’re not going to use the F35 because it’s too expensive?

T-14 is a new design that’s currently being tested,

https://defence-blog.com/russia-abandons-armata-tank-due-to-its-high-cost/

It was never real buddy. All its achievements are as fake as the T95 it’s based on.

Being critical isn’t automatically racist.

For example, the country where I’ve been groped the most is Egypt, followed shortly by India. That’s not racist.

If I were to say that every indian male is therefore a sex offender, THAT would be racist.

Oof

Yeah, it happens everywhere, all the time. And the main cause of it is, surprise surprise, people who have no technical understanding of the subject matter.

An EMP will brick any car from the past 3 decades. And also trigger ww3, so I’m not sure if you’ve got your priorities straight there.

So, all of them?

SAP meeting from bed. That’s truly hard-mode!

Translation: “Europe will sue us if we place the cookies we want, but our advertisers will sue us if we don’t”

It’s because of how the generative models are created and how they’re censored.

At it’s basic level, what a generative model does is take input data, break it into pieces, assign values to those bits based on neighbouring bits. It creates a model of which words are used together frequently in which context.

But that kind of model isn’t human-readable, it’s a giant multi-dimensional cloud of numbers and connections, not actual code. You can change the inputs used to create the model, but that means you have to manually filter all the inputs and that’s not realistic either and will probably skew your model, possibly into uselessness.

So, you have to either censor the input or the output. You don’t usually want to censor input, because there are all sorts of non-damaging questions to ask about Tiananmen square, and its very easy to dodge. So, you censor the output instead, that’s the “harm” after all.

You let the model generate a reply and then go see if it uses certain terms or specific bits of info and remove them, replacing it with a canned reply.

Which means we don’t have to trick the generative model, just the post-fact filter. And since generative models can be persuaded to change their style and form (sometimes into less-readable, more prosaic, less defined terms), it becomes very very hard to censor it effectively.

A common beauty hack is to match your lipstick colour to the colour of your nipple, so yeah.

That’s extremely cultural, and doesn’t even stand up to the a historical test. I doubt it would carry over across planets. (Works great for TV audience though)