

your characterisation of people who didn’t like it as “trolls, incels, and haters” is insulting, needlessly defensive, and does nothing to garner support for your argument.


your characterisation of people who didn’t like it as “trolls, incels, and haters” is insulting, needlessly defensive, and does nothing to garner support for your argument.


you literally did lol


don’t bother, paisley cat and haverholm are in all these threads calling anyone who didn’t like it haters


seems I was right. oh well…


why wouldn’t they? because you’ve decided they wouldn’t? and your other point is apocraphal and just strengthens the fact that lots of people don’t like it


where is the run down? I just see opinion?
oh I see you mean the comment above, unfortunately there isn’t really much there apart from a certainty of review bombing without any proof. how does anyone know that these aren’t actual reviews? I know it’s hard sometimes when people don’t like the thing you like but no need for conspiracy theories without proof


do you have proof of review bombing? your reasoning for it not being actual reviews seems thin at best. who do you think is doing it? and why?
can I also ask why you put weight in IMDb but ignore metacritic? it’s just an aggregation site after all.
rereading you comment it seems that you feel that reviews of the show don’t count unless those people also review each episode individually? I’m not sure why you think that though? most people aren’t going to continue watching a show they don’t like so why would they then continue to review each episode?
edit: spelling and clarity


because you didn’t ask for any of those things, you asked for information and were provided it
“excellent”… ok


SFA has a metacritic user score of 1.7 “overwhelming dislike”
The Scientology E-Meter (electropsychometer) is a religious artifact used in “auditing” to detect emotional reactions, spiritual distress, or “engrams” by measuring electrical resistance in the body.
First thing I thought of for some reason.