Really interested to see this proof if you have a link handy. Do you have any idea why it doesn’t apply to human cognition ?
Zos_Kia
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
I think there’s a misconception about what AGI is. The point of a “smarter” model is not that it knows all the facts, that would be wasteful as it is trivial to look up facts at inference time. The point is that a “smarter” model can generalize solutions to out of distribution problems (meaning problems that are not explicitly stated in its training corpus). So AGI wouldn’t be about a model that knows everything about language and every advancement in every field, but rather a model that is better than humans at finding solutions to problems (and fetching information from outside sources when it doesn’t know enough about a field to operate a solution).
The point about context is kind of irrelevant here as training data is not part of the inference context so you “add intelligence” to a model by re-training a new one, not by cramming the context of an existing one.


I’d say that’s more like trying to solve mental illness by making it illegal to exploit and profit from it