

I didn’t say anything about who I bank with or that I use banks that uses these practises. Calm down
I didn’t say anything about who I bank with or that I use banks that uses these practises. Calm down
Tell banks that still use it as MFA that
Yeah that’s a fair point but its a full website with only one page for streaming in this case
Seems this is the way to go amongst all the replies. Didn’t realise i could reverse proxy a camera stream! Thank you
Seems this is the way to go amongst all the replies Didn’t realise i could reverse proxy a camera stream! Thank you
Reverse proxy the stream and reference itself in the reverse proxied website? Is there no way to do it internally in nginx?
Hadn’t heard of it before. Thank you!
I dont know… you tell us! There is a market for all sorts of things
In any case this isn’t an OF/ kink kind of website, rest assured :)
Ooh i see. So Funnel provides an encrypted tunnel and proxy URL for the camera stream out of my network?
So i point the video player to that “public” address and its good to go?
Interesting!
Nothing obvious in the browser logs. Not even a 404 but ill check the other logs again. Thanks!
I need the website to serve to public users but the website itself is out of scope of this post.
One of the pages will be a video player
Apologies if it wasn’t clear.
Yes, I have an RTSP stream all the way to my local network. I can pick up the RTSP stream and also HLS, WebRTC etc. all locally. For all intents and purposes I have a stream ready to go on the local network at 192.168.X.A
The webserver is also on 192.168.X.Y and serves wordpress just fine.
I just dont know how to make the two talk. When I go to https:// website. com the embedded stream looking for 192.168.X.A doesn’t work
However if I go directly to 192.168.X.A in my browser the stream works just fine (I’ve ommited ports in this comment)
Free, self hostable, not subscription based, and lots of support. I’m making a whole website of which one page will be a “live stream”. Happy to explore other options though!
Edit: It won’t be a high traffic production website btw. Just a basic one for a select few users
Is that just to bring the webserver/ WordPress on to the same subnet? Because they already are at this point… everything’s on the 192.X subnet.
At this point we can ignore the VPN and just assume I’m trying to pick the stream up from mediaMTX
They meant they cant “WEAR” the sticker because its already been stuck on the paper it came with
Thats awful… but im not surprised. I witnessed similar when i used to contribute.
In any case i hate that theyre like this because there is a need for truly open camera firmware but their attitude makes me not even want to mention or recommend them. Especially not as a fully or truly FOSS solution
Thingino devs are bros and do it purely for the foss privacy philosophy. Contributions are encouraged and praised and the support is soo friendly and encouraging
I used to use openipc (that was the “alternative” i was referring to") but its not truly FOSS. Their default streamer is hidden behind closed doors and theyve also taken some contributions and added it to majestic never to be seen in the open again. You cant be sure what theyre doing there.
That said, it is a great alternative if you dont have ingenic based cameras. And they apparently now offer minimal other open source options for streamers…
Some of the key devs left and created thingino because of the whole foss thing. Imo theyre a much friendlier bunch too but thats purely an opinion
Check out thingino. Its a great fully open source project for privacy respecting firmware for ip cameras (unlike other alternatives) and a really helpful bunch of devs.
Might fit you well since you mention youre good with linux
Gotta find something to sell to stay afloat. Why not user data? /s