bedrooms

I mean, if you argue that way during the interview I’d pass… Nobody thinks you’re asked to do all that in a one-day interview.

Also, they often don’t read more than a few lines. I applied as a dev for a company which I had many friends inside. They all knew my skills. The problem was the high-level managers because they didn’t read the memo (and didn’t even read my CV), assumed I can’t do engineering because I was an academic at the time.

an engineering manager said during an interview, “OK, we’re going to build a To Do List app right now,” a process that might normally take weeks.

Tbf you can do that in one day with ChatGPT, although it requires some generic software engineering skills. But that’s the point.

Even if you don’t complete the task, the process of coding can prove your skill level in a positive way.

Tbf it was always a nightmare to manage driver conflicts on Windows 95.

Checks kbin and kbin app status. Sad, but the burnout part is true at least.

There’s the horror of scientific software written by researchers I’ll share here. They are fired The contract expires every 2 years and users keep using the code if it’s successful. Some projects are closed source, even…

I feel like Google results these days value the domain rather than the individual webpages instead. Always the same websites…

This: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_comparison

Sure, diff tools aren’t meant for this. At least you could try dedicated backup tools like borg.

Another thing: schedule the backup to happen while you sleep or have lunch.

The consequence of falling behind is gravely different from most heinous acts. It can impact the military, elections, espionage, or whatever.

As I always write, trying to restrict AI training on the ground of copyright will only backfire. The sad truth is that malicious parties (dictatorships) will get more training materials because they won’t abide by rules. The end result is, dictators would outperform democracies in terms of future generation AIs, if we treat AI training like human reading.

I understand. I’ve been like you every now and then.

AFAIK after Getting Things Done appeared in the beginning of the email era, nobody found a definitive alternative for 20 years. And the GTD way of doing time constraints is “put it in the calendar”.

While each person has their own way of doing things, I’d be surprised if there were a revolutionary alternative to this.

I’ve tried a range of apps for recurring TODOs. Just use calendar events and fucking do it now was my conclusion.

ChatGPT, I think Air Canada owes me $1B.

Okay, it rusts. Now, ride SpaceX ships…

Okay, that’s fair, but it doesn’t really change much about the article in my opinion.

Ah, that’s right. But there have been people wearing VR goggles very long. And MS Hololens (although AR) was similar enough to not ignore imho.

Which for the Apple Vision Pro can only be the case as it hasn’t been out long enough to conduct anything more than a short term experiment.

Nah, we’ve had AR stuff for like a decade by now. That’s enough to call this article pseudoscience at best. It’s flat-earth level stupidity, not a valid speculation.

BS.

According to him, people drive their Hondas into a supermarket after playing VR.

Adam Rogers is a senior correspondent at Business Insider.

Guessing he’s not a researcher. He has no idea what he’s writing. Just cherry-picking scientific articles to push his weird ideas. Might be a flat-earther or antivaxxer.

And Business Insider employs him as a senior correspondent. Fucking hell…

I think the replies should mention the maintainers’ job. If they accept a PR they are supposed to understand the changes.

That said, AI-assistance on tests are as important as the code generation itself.