This is a psychotic reaction to a new social media site that is better than almost all the existing ones.

What billionaire?

Yeah I think that’s exactly it

I think there’s a lot of overlap between people interested in a reddit alternative and a twitter alternative. Or maybe as that guy below says it’s just that I’m personally posting about it a lot.

Pretty lame, basically just giving lifetime achievement awards to a bunch of beloved elderly actors rather than basing the awards on the shows and performances in question.

Nice. All corporate mergers are anti-consumer and anti-worker.

In reality it’s just a factor of the difference between a comedic cartoon and live action, but I sort of love the idea of it being an actual cultural difference between the two timelines, with people in the even more utopian lower decks era having gotten looser and wackier.

Maybe society just keeps getting less formal over time and by then “Hi” is one of the more formal ways to greet someone, as opposed to just “sup” or [suggestive eyebrow movement]

Me and @YoBuckStopsHere

I felt like they were trying to show Captain Pike as going a little far when beating up Zac, but I thought he was being totally reasonable given the situation of “this guy knows how to keep your memories and you really really need to force him to hand that information over.” There was no way for him to know all he had to do was wait around in the palace for a little while.

Trying to avoid particular pieces of information is a tough problem for a federated network to solve.

Haha I kept worrying that my cats and baby would be disturbed by it but fortunately they didn’t seem to react much.

I think it makes sense that a brief bout of amnesia like that could be revealing of your underlying traits and feelings, but that in the normal course of things it’s very important to have your memories.

Yeah how loud are they being while masturbating?? Do they think keeping it down would be illogical?

Playing the lute is a euphemism for what? Vulcan masturbation?

Or at least that’s what he’ll claim as it comes crashing down around him

Cease him!

You can see that you’re just doing what I described and making an argument solely based on “eugenics” being a broad term that includes evil things right? What is the concern you have about letting parents modify their unborn child’s genes, besides the fact that it could ungenerously be described as eugenics?

It is correct actually. Make an counterargument if you can, but as I’ve been saying, there really isn’t one beyond trying to smear something reasonable like enhancing children with the brush of something bad like forced sterilizations by lumping them under the same “eugenics” label.

The problematic aspect of eugenics is sterilizing or killing people deemed inferior, people modifying their own children has none of the same issues.